For more articles and editorials concerning evaluation, tenure and financial rewards, please click here.
ARTICLES CONCERNING
EVALUATION, TENURE AND FINANCIAL REWARDS
(August 7, 2006) 2006 Merit Raises, USM College of Business
(August 8, 2006) 31st & Pearl Musings on the 2006 CoB Raises "We've looked at the list several times now, and we still don't understand why the debacle now known as the CoB 2006 Raise Process took two days to complete. If you're just making stuff up, it ought to go a little faster than that...".
(August 8, 2006) “Great 8” Merit Raises in the College of Business, 1994-2006
(August 8, 2006) The 40 Largest Single-Year Raises in USM’s College of Business, 1994-2006
(August 8, 2006) The 2006 CoB Merit Raise Process: A Side By Side Comparison of Component Parts
(August 8, 2006) The 2006 Merit Raises as seen through USMPRIDE.COM Bytes
(August 8, 2006) 31st & Pearl The Time Has Come "If you looked close enough, you have noticed that Associate Dean Niroomand's 2006 "merit" raise of $9,282 comes in at just under 7 percent of his pre-raise salary. In fact, it just squeezes under the bar set by the State of Mississippi by a measly six one-hundreths of one percentage point (approximately). Anything beyond that and Doty et al. would have had to provide written justification for Niroomand's raise. Sound to you a little like Pileum's $249,999.99 contract with USM? It should...".
(August 8, 2006) 2006 CoB Merit Raise Process: Correlating Raises with Characteristics "A recent usmpride.com document expressed each individual faculty's dollar merit raise as a percentage of his previous salary, giving us each faculty's percentage merit raise. Based on other documents posed at usmpride.com, we calculated the correlations below:...".
(August 8, 2006) 2006 CoB Merit Raise Process: Ranking by Percentage Raise
(August 9, 2006) History of the 2006 CoB Great 8 Merit Raises by Rank
(August 9, 2006) The USM College of Business “‘Equity Raise’ of 2006” Post-Op Report "... As with our Pre-Op report on Doty’s plan for “gender equity,” this Post-Op analysis is limited by the absence of useful teaching, research and service data to support a claim of gender bias (in either direction). With the information we have at our disposal, however, our first report suggested that there was no gender equity issue in the CoB before the 2006 merit raise process. This Post-Op analysis suggests that Doty, in a stated aim to boost the salaries of CoB females, may be on his way toward creating one."
(August 10, 2006) SEDONA Files "... In this issue we re-visit the SEDONA records of CoB Associate Dean Farhang Niroomand, examining aspects of a few areas of his academic record. We begin with some of his 'academic experience.'...".