For more articles and editorials concerning evaluation, tenure and financial rewards, please click here.
(July 27, 2006) About SEDONA: A Mock Interview with a CoB Administrator [Disclaimer: The interview below never
really occurred. What you see represents a "mock interview" with a CoB Administrator. However, the statements we
present as answers to our mock questions are real, and were written by actual [and current] CoB administrators at
some point since October of 2005. They serve to show the administration's frenzy about completing the Sedona files
leading up to the 2006 evaluation period]
ARTICLES CONCERNING
EVALUATION, TENURE AND FINANCIAL REWARDS
(July 31, 2006)(updated with responses from Dr. Jordan) SEDONA Files "... Some of the latest documents appearing on
usmpride.com have focused on so-called agreements between Doty and various faculty in the CoB that deal with
“navigation” of the promotion and tenure process. This issue of SEDONA Files touches on some of these
controversies. We turn our attention to the SEDONA records of Charles Jordan, Professor of Accounting. In the Service
to the University section, the following entries appear in Jordan’s SEDONA records:...".
(July 30, 2006) (updated July 31, 2006) The Alternate Route to Tenure in the CoB Most USM faculty think that the route
to tenure at the institution is paved with scholarship, service, and instruction, or as they are usually known: teaching,
research, and service. The USM Faculty Handbook provides the following guidance regarding tenure:
(August 2, 2006) 31st & Pearl USMpride.com or Your Lyin' Eyes? "…We are all just a few weeks into usmpride.com's
process of "opening up" the CoB's evaluation system. With all of the documentation coming out we can't help but
believe that the cadre of CoB administrators and their sycophants will be doing their level best to convince you that
you have lyin' eyes. Sure, you don't want to believe that the CoB evaluation system is corrupt, but the evidence is
mounting…"